PBKS’s catching inefficiency comes home to roost

Home » Match News » IPL News » PBKS’s catching inefficiency comes home to roost

PBKS's catching inefficiency comes home to roost

The margin read 33 runs, but the key differentiator between SRH and PBKS was one never reflected in scorecards. In the reverse fixture in Mullanpur, PBKS had restricted SRH to 219/6 after being taken for 105/0 in the powerplay, and later gunned down the total without fuss. Travis Head and Abhishek Sharma resumed normal service in Hyderabad as SRH went past 50 in 3.2 overs. The openers' dismissals by the seventh over gave PBKS an opening earlier than in Mullanpur, but they failed to capitalize.

Marco Jansen's nonchalant one-handed stunner at the boundary to dismiss Ishan Kishan was a key moment. Kishan was given three reprieves: on 9, 18, and 20 — two dropped catches by Cooper Connolly and Lockie Ferguson, plus a missed stumping. Heinrich Klaasen was dropped by Shashank Singh on 13 — his fifth missed opportunity of the season. All within four overs. Both Kishan and Klaasen scored brisk fifties, powering SRH to 235/4, enough to dethrone PBKS from the top spot.

Three of SRH's big-four are in the top four of the Orange Cap race. They collectively average 49.32 and strike at 187.38 in wins, compared to 31.62 and 164.28 in defeats.

Despite being the second-worst catching side, PBKS are placed second after 49 games. The old adage of "catches win matches" holds true. PBKS had been sloppy, but opponents had been equally generous, before SRH outplayed them in all three departments.

While PBKS' catching efficiency is 73.6% (only better than DC's 64.5%), they have been the luckiest side while batting, with opponents converting just 68.8% of chances. KL Rahul was on 12 when Shashank dropped him in Delhi, and went on to score 152* to power DC to 264/2. PBKS dropped three catches in the first half that day; DC returned the favour with seven.

SRH and PBKS have had poor catching efficiency against them. Of the 10 batters to get at least four reprieves, seven are from these two teams: Head (7), Connolly (6), Ayush Mhatre (5), Shreyas (5), Abhishek (4), Klaasen (4), Kishan (4), Prabhsimran (4), Vaibhav Sooryavanshi (4), Pathum Nissanka (4).

12 other batters have three reprieves each, including Virat Kohli, Sanju Samson, KL Rahul, Shubman Gill, Sai Sudharsan and Jos Buttler. Yuzvendra Chahal has had eight chances missed off his bowling, twice more than the next most.

Catching efficiency in IPL 2026 (by teams and their opponents)

Team Catches Dropped Efficiency (%) Opp Efficiency (%)
KKR 47 6 88.6 84
RR 48 7 87.2 75
RCB 48 8 85.7 86
LSG 40 8 83.3 82.8
GT 61 14 81.3 81.4
MI 35 10 77.7 90.7
CSK 49 15 76.5 74.5
SRH 57 18 76 74
PBKS 42 15 73.6 68.8
DC 31 17 64.5 81

PBKS have a catching efficiency of 68.4% in wins and 82.3% in defeats. The latter was 100% before SRH dropped Connolly thrice, with his 107* merely delaying the result.

Catching efficiency in IPL 2026 (by results)

Team In wins (%) In defeats (%) Difference
DC 92 34.7 57.3
MI 94.1 67.8 26.3
CSK 82.9 65.2 17.7
RR 94.5 72.2 12.3
GT 84.3 75 9.7
RCB 88 78.5 9.5
SRH 75.4 68.4 7
KKR 88.4 88.8 -0.4
LSG 80 84.2 -4.2
PBKS 68.4 82.3 -13.9

PBKS comfortably top average runs per wicket (38.04) and run-rate (11.05) among the 10 teams, helping them stay in the top two despite three straight defeats. They have been the second-worst bowling unit in economy-rate (10.32) and strike-rate (24.9). The inefficiency in the third department could see them slide further.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

How Pat Cummins made his least reliable balls count
How Pat Cummins made his least reliable balls count Pat Cummins made the difference on
Shamas, Feroza hit tons as Pakistan win big to clinch ODI series
Shamas, Feroza hit tons as Pakistan win big to clinch ODI series Sadaf Shamas and